What the Supreme Court still doesn't understand about guns

The court ruled 5-4 that, as The Hill.com put it, "one legal gun owner may not acquire a firearm on behalf of another — a practice known as "straw" purchasing. The Supreme Court's decision in Abramski v. United States merely confirmed a horrible injustice, with no understanding of how gun tracing works, and without producing any increased safety for Americans. John Hames shared with you:   What the Supreme Court still doesn't understand about guns Fox News - A detail of the United States Supreme Court is seen at dawn in Washington.Reuters In what's being hailed by many as a victory for gun-control advocates, the recent Supreme Court decision on "straw" purchases of guns has completely muddled the whole issue of background checks and "straw" purchases for potential gun owners. Available on the App Store.

John Hames