Witness No. 10 and Darren Wilson's self-defense claim

Cassell notes that Missouri law on self-defense required only that Darren Wilson have a reasonable belief that he needed to use deadly force to defend himself against Michael Brown. Wilson didn't need to show that his interpretation was the only one, just that it was reasonable — i.e., a conclusion a reasonable person could reach based on all the facts. John Hames shared with you:   Witness No. 10 and Darren Wilson's self-defense claim Power Line - Paul Cassell, a former federal judge, has been producing the best analysis I've seen of the Ferguson grand jury evidence. I recommend in particular this post, which contains links to others. Available on the App Store.

John Hames

Listen to my podcast!! www.OldGuardAudio.com